what do you think is more likely, they uploaded an impossible level or we haven't figured it out
Viewing post in The Snake That Eats Puzzle Game Mechanics comments
When I said mathematically impossible, I meant that it seemed absolutely impossible to solve due to the placement of the items instead of the level being really difficult. Sometimes misunderstandings happen since English is not my first language, that's on me. Apart from that, I'm having a really difficult time trying to make sense of your interrogative attitude. You sound a little bit immature.
Abi anlamadığın işe 'mathematically impossible' diyen ben değilim. 'Immature'. Bir şeyi anlamadın, hemen yüzde yüz yanlış üretildiğini düşündün ve sanki bunu matematik üstünden kanıtladığını ifade ettin. Bence 'mature' olmak bir şeyi kapsayamadığını ispatlayabilmek ve kendi anlayışlarını yalandan büyütmemek.
I'll continue in English for others to be able to understand too. As I've stated, what I meant is that the level seemed impossible to solve instead of being really difficult. I didn't claim to have done calculations even though it sounded like that (language barrier). And still, the level still seems impossible due to the placement of the bricks, yet I've admitted that I might be wrong since the maker of the level says that it's confirmed to be solvable. Back to your attitude, you kept pestering me about what mathematical calculations I have made. I really don't understand why. Becuase you felt attacked? Well, you shouldn't feel attacked just because somebody made a comment about someone's game. You wanted to feel good by pushing someone just because they used a wrong word? Well, that's just shows signs of immaturity instead of doing a real harm to me. We can go on if you wish, but I don't see a point.
I'd say the reasons for each of my comments are fairly immanent in the comments themselves. My last comment was in response to you saying I seemed "immature". I don't think it should come as a surprise that I'd be engaged by that. Maybe you instead meant it as a mic-drop moment, but now you're coming back to do some "no you hang up" thing.
I am not harassing you by replying to your replies, which are both to me and about me. You can expect replies to your replies. That's normal.
How the conversation started was not about you but the game itself. You first questioned what mathematical calculations I've done and I kind of ignored. Later I responded to the maker of the level instead, which was not to nor about you. You still couldn't help but to ask about the mathematics again (immature). While you're on this site for drama, I'm here to share my work, inspire and get inspired. So I'm not losing time with your kind any further. Take care and have a good day!
confirming that after a few days of revisiting, i have finally beaten the second level. I thought for sure, at first, it was impossible. I stumbled upon the first move - confusing the snake's pathfinding and letting it commit a disadvantageous path. From there, I worked out blocking with the barrels for a long long time until I finally discovered a configuration that let me freely solve the remainder of the puzzle.
Pretty difficult puzzle but super nice to solve - no hidden mechanics, just challenge your assumptions and consider where the computer would make a mistake in good faith. The snake does not read bombs as obstacles.