The 2nd level is impossible. The snake is too close to me and one hole is surrounded by apples, and is thus inaccessible.
Viewing post in The Snake That Eats Puzzle Game Mechanics comments
I’m also having a lot of difficulty figuring out what to do; I get the general idea (bait the snake into the fruits so that it stops to eat them, allowing you to create distance), but I would have benefited from some introductory levels/isolated areas to teach me how to play it.
I love the concept of this project and each individual game I’ve looked at has been interesting, my brain’s just not quite big enough.
When I said mathematically impossible, I meant that it seemed absolutely impossible to solve due to the placement of the items instead of the level being really difficult. Sometimes misunderstandings happen since English is not my first language, that's on me. Apart from that, I'm having a really difficult time trying to make sense of your interrogative attitude. You sound a little bit immature.
Abi anlamadığın işe 'mathematically impossible' diyen ben değilim. 'Immature'. Bir şeyi anlamadın, hemen yüzde yüz yanlış üretildiğini düşündün ve sanki bunu matematik üstünden kanıtladığını ifade ettin. Bence 'mature' olmak bir şeyi kapsayamadığını ispatlayabilmek ve kendi anlayışlarını yalandan büyütmemek.
I'll continue in English for others to be able to understand too. As I've stated, what I meant is that the level seemed impossible to solve instead of being really difficult. I didn't claim to have done calculations even though it sounded like that (language barrier). And still, the level still seems impossible due to the placement of the bricks, yet I've admitted that I might be wrong since the maker of the level says that it's confirmed to be solvable. Back to your attitude, you kept pestering me about what mathematical calculations I have made. I really don't understand why. Becuase you felt attacked? Well, you shouldn't feel attacked just because somebody made a comment about someone's game. You wanted to feel good by pushing someone just because they used a wrong word? Well, that's just shows signs of immaturity instead of doing a real harm to me. We can go on if you wish, but I don't see a point.
I'd say the reasons for each of my comments are fairly immanent in the comments themselves. My last comment was in response to you saying I seemed "immature". I don't think it should come as a surprise that I'd be engaged by that. Maybe you instead meant it as a mic-drop moment, but now you're coming back to do some "no you hang up" thing.
I am not harassing you by replying to your replies, which are both to me and about me. You can expect replies to your replies. That's normal.
confirming that after a few days of revisiting, i have finally beaten the second level. I thought for sure, at first, it was impossible. I stumbled upon the first move - confusing the snake's pathfinding and letting it commit a disadvantageous path. From there, I worked out blocking with the barrels for a long long time until I finally discovered a configuration that let me freely solve the remainder of the puzzle.
Pretty difficult puzzle but super nice to solve - no hidden mechanics, just challenge your assumptions and consider where the computer would make a mistake in good faith. The snake does not read bombs as obstacles.